Just my random thought of the day.
You'd think that as a lawyer I'd know this, but I wonder if the new anti-smoking legislation here in HK makes any distinction between smoking (as in putting a cigarette to your lips and puffing) and the simple act of lighting a cigarette indoors?
There is some relevance to my question. I saw some dailies from a photoshoot yesterday where the model was called upon to evoke a 1930s Shanghai look, and she was holding a cigarette rather rakishly in her hand. Problem was, of course, it wasn't lit as the shoot was taking place in a cafe. But the effect of the photo was lost, IMO. It's not quite the same when the model is holding what is basically a dead white stick. You need to ash and smoke for it to come alive.
Funny I'd say this since I don't smoke, but hey.
Smoking kills, kids!
And stay in school!
more of my photos: www.flickr.com/photos/justinlim